| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abstract arguments aside, what is the situation we are looking at. Every situation involving a possible New Player can be broken down simply: If your not in a new player system, no problem, if your not doing anything that would conceivably mess w...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2012.06.15 19:19:00
|
2. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A lot of this seems to boil down to people saying "Don't mess with Noobs" Its SIMPLE! and the other side saying "Whats a Noob?, whats mess with mean?, it's nto simple!" To my mind they are both right. CCCP and for that matter EVE itself, NEEDS...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2012.06.14 19:12:00
|
3. 2 Things I didn't know about Wormholes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What I believe is the mechanic you cannot enter the same wormhole through the same side within the time limit. To the original OP : your friend going through the WM had nothing to do with it.
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.03.16 19:57:00
|
4. Penalty for fitting a second..... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I don't agree. Ship res bonuses are absolute bonuses to defense which is a good thing. Yes it lessens the impact of using hardeners but it lessens the need for them by exactly the same amount.
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.03.11 00:23:00
|
5. wormhole can not get it. - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
launch multiple probes. Try to get the target are in the intersection area of all the probes
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.03.11 00:16:00
|
6. New Dev Blog: What Have We Done! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Its perfectly possible to scout sleeper locations. Just use a cloaked Covert Ops. Scan for their locations, jump in cloaked bm the ones you can beat. then come back in some heavy iron. If you can't fly a covert ops well then use a really fast fri...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.03.10 21:32:00
|
7. Best ISK/hour activity - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Edited by: Lincoln Armm on 09/03/2009 19:00:25 I think when you take into consideration all factors, IN GENERAL l4 high sec missions pay the most per hour. Any activity in 0.0 has both much higher risks and additional time sinks involved. ...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.03.09 18:59:00
|
8. New Dev Blog: A Virgin Mind - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Lincoln Armm on 03/03/2009 20:29:45 Originally by: Beckoner Venhatha This is my second time around in EVE (marital stress put paid to my first char in 2004/5) Neither time did i feel the need to 'catch up' any of the 10M SP...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.03.03 20:27:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: How the AI pew pews the player - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Moving toward PvE and PvP combat being similar is def the way to go but there is a major hurdle that you so far have not talked about. PvE in EVE is a net profit activity while PvE is a net loss. We can go into why this is but its not important f...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.02.24 21:01:00
|
10. Getting more people into lowsec and 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The original posters question is "how do we get more people in low sec", but several people have brought up points of view onthe more fundamental question "is it desirable to have more people in lowsec"? and also "what changes can be made without ...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.02.12 20:53:00
|
11. New Dev Blog: POS Exploit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Just to make something clear, this exploit did not generate isk and therefore did not have a general inflationary effect. It generated goods and was therefore deflationary. Of course the exploiters themselves were able to gain large amounts of isk...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2009.02.11 21:51:00
|
12. CCP Zulupark answers your every question! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Currently PvE combat and PvP combat are extremely different (and therefore require different fittings etc). Does CCP see this as a problem? ANd if so how do they plan to address it? EVE has many game mechanics that are a poor moment-to-moment exp...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2008.10.24 18:17:00
|
13. Boot.ini jokes, Funny Cartoons, things to help the pain it caused - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
My favorite so far is the short pithy "boot.ini to the head"
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.12.09 21:57:00
|
14. The Star in the North??? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Its CCP's pile of cash. It's grown so large that it's formed a enormous star.
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.12.09 21:04:00
|
15. 48 hour rollback? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Its much better to deal with the cases individually then rolling back the server (Which is almost certainly technically impossible).
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.12.07 03:32:00
|
16. Mass of modules increased? or bug? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you thiink this hurts small corps more then big ones you are very much mistaken. Min compression is used mainly to ship large amounts of mins out to 0.0. Not exactly a small corp activity. This is not being done to "hurt" anyone its to increas...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.12.07 03:30:00
|
17. New Fendahl Dev Blog, ARM Scripts and Bandwidth - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
While the idea of tuning modules for a specific purpose has possibilities. I don't understand why they started with a group of modules that even with two bonuses are pretty underpowered. An obvious problem with EV's game design is that as the num...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.11.30 17:57:00
|
18. Run for office in EVE, the new CSM by Xhagen - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
To me the proxy system is similar to if the act of registering for a party counted as your vote unless you showed up to vote. Sure the vot count would look great (90% votes cast Yea!) but would it be a good idea? I think its pretty clear it wouldn...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.11.27 03:39:00
|
19. Run for office in EVE, the new CSM by Xhagen - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Lincoln Armm on 27/11/2007 03:28:16 Originally by: Theodred Matana Quote: Nothing will effectively stop ignorant people from voting, but Lincoln Armm was talking about folks that can't be bothered... folks that just do...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.11.27 03:27:00
|
20. Run for office in EVE, the new CSM by Xhagen - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Frankly, ignorrant people who vote randomly (i.e. that person's name sounds cool), aren't really a problem. That sort of "noise" shows up in any election. But proxies provide a system for some of these people to be harnessed and focused. Obviously...
- by Lincoln Armm - at 2007.11.27 01:10:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |